Biscom Secure File Transfer up to 5.0.1048 dataFieldId input validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Biscom Secure File Transfer up to 5.0.1048. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation of the argument dataFieldId as part of Request leads to input validation. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2016-10710. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Biscom Secure File Transfer up to 5.0.1048 (File Transfer Software). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown code. The manipulation of the argument dataFieldId as part of a Request leads to a input validation vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. Impacted is integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Biscom Secure File Transfer (SFT) 5.0.1000 through 5.0.1048 does not validate the dataFieldId value, and uses sequential numbers, which allows remote authenticated users to overwrite or read files via crafted requests. Version 5.0.1050 contains the fix.
The bug was discovered 02/01/2016. The weakness was published 01/25/2018 (Website). The advisory is shared at threat.tevora.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2016-10710 since 01/25/2018. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. A simple authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 724 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
Upgrading to version 5.0.1050 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Base Score: 5.4
VulDB Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Secure File Transfer 5.0.1050
Timeline
02/01/2016 🔍01/25/2018 🔍
01/25/2018 🔍
01/25/2018 🔍
01/26/2018 🔍
12/27/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: threat.tevora.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2016-10710 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-10710
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-112445
Entry
Created: 01/26/2018 07:57Updated: 12/27/2019 17:08
Changes: 01/26/2018 07:57 (60), 12/27/2019 17:08 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.