Conceptronic CIPCAMPTIWL 0.61.30.21 hy-cgi/user.cgi cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Conceptronic CIPCAMPTIWL 0.61.30.21. Impacted is an unknown function of the file hy-cgi/user.cgi. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2018-6408. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Conceptronic CIPCAMPTIWL 0.61.30.21 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown functionality of the file hy-cgi/user.cgi. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered on Conceptronic CIPCAMPTIWL V3 0.61.30.21 devices. CSRF exists in hy-cgi/user.cgi, as demonstrated by changing an administrator password or adding a new administrator account.
The bug was discovered 01/31/2018. The weakness was disclosed 01/30/2018 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2018-6408 since 01/30/2018. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entry VDB-112666 is pretty similar. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/30/2018 🔍01/30/2018 🔍
01/30/2018 🔍
01/31/2018 🔍
01/31/2018 🔍
12/31/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2018-6408 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-6408
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-112667
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 01/31/2018 09:07Updated: 12/31/2019 15:14
Changes: 01/31/2018 09:07 (56), 12/31/2019 15:14 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.