nProtect AVS 4.0.0.38 Driver TKFsAv.SYS input validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in nProtect AVS 4.0.0.38. This issue affects some unknown processing in the library TKFsAv.SYS of the component Driver. This manipulation causes input validation. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2018-6525. The attack needs to be launched locally. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in nProtect AVS 4.0.0.38 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality in the library TKFsAv.SYS of the component Driver. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
In nProtect AVS V4.0 4.0.0.38, the driver file (TKFsAv.SYS) allows local users to cause a denial of service (BSOD) or possibly have unspecified other impact because of not validating input values from IOCtl 0x220458.
The bug was discovered 02/01/2018. The weakness was published 02/02/2018 (Website). The advisory is shared at inca.co.kr. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2018-6525 since 02/01/2018. An attack has to be approached locally. A single authentication is required for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Similar entries are available at VDB-112762, VDB-112763 and VDB-112764. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Base Score: 6.6
VulDB Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/01/2018 🔍02/01/2018 🔍
02/01/2018 🔍
02/02/2018 🔍
02/03/2018 🔍
01/01/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: inca.co.krStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2018-6525 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-6525
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-112765
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 02/03/2018 08:57Updated: 01/01/2020 10:15
Changes: 02/03/2018 08:57 (58), 01/01/2020 10:15 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.