| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in SAP NetWeaver AS JAVA 7.50 and classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the component SAML 2.0 Handler. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2018-2371. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in SAP NetWeaver AS JAVA 7.50 (Solution Stack Software). This affects an unknown part of the component SAML 2.0 Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
The SAML 2.0 service provider of SAP Netweaver AS Java Web Application, 7.50, does not sufficiently encode user controlled inputs, which results in Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.
The bug was discovered 02/13/2018. The weakness was disclosed 02/14/2018 (Website). The advisory is shared at blogs.sap.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2018-2371 since 12/15/2017. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 01/04/2020). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 103005†). The entries VDB-113286, VDB-113274, VDB-113275 and VDB-113276 are pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.sap.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/15/2017 🔍02/13/2018 🔍
02/13/2018 🔍
02/14/2018 🔍
02/14/2018 🔍
02/15/2018 🔍
01/04/2020 🔍
Sources
Vendor: sap.comAdvisory: blogs.sap.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2018-2371 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-2371
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-113277
SecurityFocus: 103005 - SAP NetWeaver CVE-2018-2371 Cross Site Scripting Vulnerability
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20150716
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 02/15/2018 08:36Updated: 01/04/2020 21:02
Changes: 02/15/2018 08:36 (60), 01/04/2020 21:02 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.