SAP Internet Graphics Server up to 7.53 Stored cross site scripting

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in SAP Internet Graphics Server 7.20/7.20EXT/7.45/7.49/7.53. It has been classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. This manipulation causes cross site scripting (Stored). This vulnerability appears as CVE-2018-2388. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in SAP Internet Graphics Server 7.20/7.20EXT/7.45/7.49/7.53 (Application Server Software). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability (Stored). The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in SAP internet Graphics Server, 7.20, 7.20EXT, 7.45, 7.49, 7.53.
The bug was discovered 02/13/2018. The weakness was presented 02/14/2018 (Website). The advisory is shared at blogs.sap.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2018-2388 since 12/15/2017. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 01/05/2020). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
See VDB-113286, VDB-113274, VDB-113275 and VDB-113276 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.sap.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: StoredClass: Cross site scripting / Stored
CWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/15/2017 🔍02/13/2018 🔍
02/14/2018 🔍
02/14/2018 🔍
02/15/2018 🔍
01/05/2020 🔍
Sources
Vendor: sap.comAdvisory: blogs.sap.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2018-2388 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-2388
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-113293
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20150716
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 02/15/2018 08:40Updated: 01/05/2020 07:35
Changes: 02/15/2018 08:40 (58), 01/05/2020 07:35 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.