| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.5 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in HPE Intelligent Management Center 7.2 and classified as critical. Impacted is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to input validation. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2017-8957. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in HPE Intelligent Management Center 7.2 (Log Management Software) and classified as critical. This issue affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) PLAT version 7.2 was found.
The bug was discovered 07/21/2017. The weakness was shared 02/15/2018 by sztivi with Zero Day Initiative (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at support.hpe.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2017-8957 since 05/15/2017. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 01/06/2020).
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 209 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 99925†). The entries VDB-113456 and VDB-113457 are related to this item. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.hpe.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.5
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/15/2017 🔍07/21/2017 🔍
07/22/2017 🔍
02/15/2018 🔍
02/15/2018 🔍
02/16/2018 🔍
01/06/2020 🔍
Sources
Vendor: hpe.comAdvisory: support.hpe.com
Researcher: sztivi
Organization: Zero Day Initiative
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2017-8957 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-8957
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-113459
SecurityFocus: 99925 - HP Intelligent Management Center PLAT Multiple Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 02/16/2018 12:52Updated: 01/06/2020 09:51
Changes: 02/16/2018 12:52 (59), 01/06/2020 09:51 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.