Wireless IP Camera 360 Service Port 9527 Password hard-coded credentials
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Wireless IP Camera 360. It has been rated as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the component Service Port 9527. This manipulation of the argument Password with the input 123456 causes hard-coded credentials.
This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2017-11634. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
It is advisable to implement restrictive firewalling.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Wireless IP Camera 360 (Network Camera Software) (version unknown) and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the component Service Port 9527. The manipulation of the argument password with the input value 123456 leads to a hard-coded credentials vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-798. The product contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered on Wireless IP Camera 360 devices. Remote attackers can discover a weakly encoded admin password by connecting to TCP port 9527 and reading the password field of the debugging information, e.g., nTBCS19C corresponds to a password of 123456.
The bug was discovered 07/25/2017. The weakness was disclosed 02/26/2018 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-11634 since 07/25/2017. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1110.001 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 216 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
Proper firewalling of tcp/9527 is able to address this issue.
The entries VDB-113825, VDB-113826 and VDB-113828 are pretty similar. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Hard-coded credentialsCWE: CWE-798 / CWE-259 / CWE-255
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: FirewallStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Firewalling: 🔍
Timeline
07/25/2017 🔍07/25/2017 🔍
02/26/2018 🔍
02/26/2018 🔍
02/27/2018 🔍
01/08/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-11634 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-11634
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-113827
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 02/27/2018 07:46Updated: 01/08/2020 15:52
Changes: 02/27/2018 07:46 (61), 01/08/2020 15:52 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.