| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Icinga up to 2.8.1. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cryptographic issue (Password). This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2018-6535. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Icinga up to 2.8.1. This issue affects an unknown code. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cryptographic issue vulnerability (Password). Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-310. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered in Icinga 2.x through 2.8.1. The lack of a constant-time password comparison function can disclose the password to an attacker.
The bug was discovered 02/21/2018. The weakness was published 02/27/2018 (GitHub Repository). It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2018-6535 since 02/02/2018. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1600 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 6 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Similar entries are available at VDB-113914, VDB-113913 and VDB-113912. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.8
VulDB Base Score: 3.7
VulDB Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: PasswordClass: Cryptographic issue / Password
CWE: CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
OpenVAS ID: 865434
OpenVAS Name: Icinga2 < 2.8.2 Multiple Vulnerabilities
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Patch: github.com
Timeline
02/02/2018 🔍02/21/2018 🔍
02/27/2018 🔍
02/27/2018 🔍
02/28/2018 🔍
02/16/2023 🔍
Sources
Advisory: 4920Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2018-6535 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-6535
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-113915
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 02/28/2018 09:16Updated: 02/16/2023 08:28
Changes: 02/28/2018 09:16 (61), 01/09/2020 10:37 (2), 02/16/2023 08:28 (5)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:D4A:103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.