DrayTek Vigor AP910C 1.2.0_RC3 Build r6594 cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in DrayTek Vigor AP910C 1.2.0_RC3 Build r6594. It has been classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2017-11649. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in DrayTek Vigor AP910C 1.2.0_RC3 Build r6594 (Router Operating System) and classified as problematic. This issue affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DrayTek Vigor AP910C devices with firmware 1.2.0_RC3 build r6594 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified users for requests that enable SNMP on the remote device via vectors involving goform/setSnmp.
The bug was discovered 03/06/2018. The weakness was released 03/07/2018 (Website). The advisory is shared at iscouncil.blogspot.in. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2017-11649 since 07/25/2017. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Entry connected to this vulnerability is available at VDB-114162. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/25/2017 🔍03/06/2018 🔍
03/06/2018 🔍
03/07/2018 🔍
03/07/2018 🔍
01/11/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: iscouncil.blogspot.inStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-11649 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-11649
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-114161
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/07/2018 11:02Updated: 01/11/2020 08:29
Changes: 03/07/2018 11:02 (56), 01/11/2020 08:29 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.