DocuTrac QuicDoc / Office Therapy up to 1.6.4.0 DTISQLInstaller.exe hard-coded credentials
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in DocuTrac QuicDoc and Office Therapy up to 1.6.4.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file DTISQLInstaller.exe. This manipulation causes hard-coded credentials. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2018-5551. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in DocuTrac QuicDoc and Office Therapy up to 1.6.4.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block of the file DTISQLInstaller.exe. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a hard-coded credentials vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-798. The product contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Versions of DocuTrac QuicDoc and Office Therapy that ship with DTISQLInstaller.exe version 1.6.4.0 and prior contain three credentials with known passwords: QDMaster, OTMaster, and sa.
The bug was discovered 03/14/2018. The weakness was presented 03/19/2018 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at blog.rapid7.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2018-5551 since 01/12/2018. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1110.001 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 5 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
See VDB-114764 for similar entry. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.8
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 10.0
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.0
CNA Vector (Rapid7, Inc.): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Hard-coded credentialsCWE: CWE-798 / CWE-259 / CWE-255
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/12/2018 🔍03/14/2018 🔍
03/19/2018 🔍
03/19/2018 🔍
03/19/2018 🔍
02/22/2023 🔍
Sources
Advisory: blog.rapid7.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2018-5551 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-5551
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-114763
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/19/2018 20:34Updated: 02/22/2023 11:13
Changes: 03/19/2018 20:34 (58), 01/14/2020 21:14 (1), 02/05/2021 13:18 (3), 02/22/2023 11:13 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.