Google Android msm_pcm_hw_params Return Value input validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.6 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Google Android and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is the function msm_pcm_hw_params. This manipulation as part of Return Value causes input validation.
This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2017-14892. The attack is restricted to local execution. No exploit exists.
Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Google Android (Smartphone Operating System) (the affected version unknown). Affected by this vulnerability is the function msm_pcm_hw_params. The manipulation as part of a Return Value leads to a input validation vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
In the function msm_pcm_hw_params() in Android for MSM, Firefox OS for MSM, and QRD Android before 2017-09-19, the return value of q6asm_open_shared_io() is not checked properly potentially leading to a possible dangling pointer access.
The bug was discovered 04/10/2018. The weakness was disclosed 03/30/2018 (Website). The advisory is shared at source.android.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-14892 since 09/28/2017. The exploitation appears to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 02/24/2023). It is expected to see the exploit prices for this product increasing in the near future.
Applying a patch is able to eliminate this problem.
The entries VDB-110104, VDB-113150, VDB-113156 and VDB-113159 are pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.google.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.6
VulDB Base Score: 7.8
VulDB Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: PatchStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Patch: source.codeaurora.org
Timeline
09/28/2017 🔍03/30/2018 🔍
03/30/2018 🔍
03/31/2018 🔍
04/10/2018 🔍
02/24/2023 🔍
Sources
Vendor: google.comAdvisory: source.android.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2017-14892 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-14892
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-115237
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20150917
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/31/2018 09:54Updated: 02/24/2023 14:43
Changes: 03/31/2018 09:54 (59), 01/18/2020 09:54 (2), 02/24/2023 14:43 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.