D-Link DIR-629-B1 /htdocs/cgibin weblogin_log REMOTE_ADDR memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.5 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in D-Link DIR-629-B1. This affects the function weblogin_log of the file /htdocs/cgibin. The manipulation of the argument REMOTE_ADDR as part of Environment Variable leads to memory corruption.
This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2018-10996. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in D-Link DIR-629-B1 (Router Operating System) (the affected version is unknown) and classified as critical. This issue affects the function weblogin_log of the file /htdocs/cgibin. The manipulation of the argument REMOTE_ADDR as part of a Environment Variable leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The weblogin_log function in /htdocs/cgibin on D-Link DIR-629-B1 devices allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow) via a session.cgi?ACTION=logout request involving a long REMOTE_ADDR environment variable.
The bug was discovered 05/11/2018. The weakness was presented 05/12/2018 (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2018-10996 since 05/11/2018. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 02/04/2020).
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 104277†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.dlink.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.5
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/11/2018 🔍05/11/2018 🔍
05/12/2018 🔍
05/12/2018 🔍
05/12/2018 🔍
05/12/2018 🔍
02/04/2020 🔍
Sources
Vendor: dlink.comAdvisory: securityfocus.com⛔
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2018-10996 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-10996
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-117653
SecurityFocus: 104277 - D-Link DIR-629-B1 'weblogin_log' Function Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Entry
Created: 05/12/2018 21:31Updated: 02/04/2020 17:15
Changes: 05/12/2018 21:31 (61), 02/04/2020 17:15 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.