GE MDS PulseNET/MDS PulseNET Enterprise 3.2.1 path traversal
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in GE MDS PulseNET and MDS PulseNET Enterprise 3.2.1. Impacted is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in path traversal. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2018-10615. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in GE MDS PulseNET and MDS PulseNET Enterprise 3.2.1. This affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Directory traversal may lead to files being exfiltrated or deleted on the GE MDS PulseNET and MDS PulseNET Enterprise version 3.2.1 and prior host platform.
The bug was discovered 05/31/2018. The weakness was disclosed 06/04/2018 by rgod (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at gegridsolutions.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2018-10615 since 05/01/2018. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. A authentication is required for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1006 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 4 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 104377†). The entries VDB-118825 and VDB-118826 are pretty similar. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.ge.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/01/2018 🔍05/31/2018 🔍
05/31/2018 🔍
06/04/2018 🔍
06/04/2018 🔍
06/04/2018 🔍
02/14/2020 🔍
Sources
Vendor: ge.comAdvisory: gegridsolutions.com
Researcher: rgod
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2018-10615 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-10615
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-118827
SecurityFocus: 104377 - Multiple GE MDS PulseNET Products Multiple Security vulnerabilities
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/04/2018 21:22Updated: 02/14/2020 08:44
Changes: 06/04/2018 21:22 (58), 02/14/2020 08:44 (5)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.