GitHub Plugin up to 1.29.0 on Jenkins GitHubServerConfig.java Credentials information disclosure
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in GitHub Plugin up to 1.29.0 on Jenkins. This affects an unknown function of the file GitHubServerConfig.java. The manipulation leads to information disclosure (Credentials). This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2018-1000183. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in GitHub Plugin up to 1.29.0 on Jenkins (Bug Tracking Software). This issue affects an unknown functionality of the file GitHubServerConfig.java. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability (Credentials). Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
A exposure of sensitive information vulnerability exists in Jenkins GitHub Plugin 1.29.0 and older in GitHubServerConfig.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read access to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.
The bug was discovered 06/05/2018. The weakness was presented 06/05/2018 (Website). The advisory is shared at jenkins.io. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2018-1000183 since 06/05/2018. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. The successful exploitation needs a simple authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
See VDB-118974 for similar entry. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
- 1.0
- 1.1
- 1.2
- 1.3
- 1.4
- 1.5
- 1.6
- 1.7
- 1.8
- 1.9
- 1.10
- 1.11
- 1.12
- 1.13
- 1.14
- 1.15
- 1.16
- 1.17
- 1.18
- 1.19
- 1.20
- 1.21
- 1.22
- 1.23
- 1.24
- 1.25
- 1.26
- 1.27
- 1.28
- 1.29.0
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: CredentialsClass: Information disclosure / Credentials
CWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
Timeline
06/05/2018 🔍06/05/2018 🔍
06/05/2018 🔍
06/05/2018 🔍
06/06/2018 🔍
07/16/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: jenkins.ioStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2018-1000183 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-1000183
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-118973
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/06/2018 10:17Updated: 07/16/2020 18:58
Changes: 06/06/2018 10:17 (58), 07/16/2020 18:58 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.