forwarded on Node.js Regular Expression resource consumption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in forwarded on Node.js. Affected is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation as part of Regular Expression results in resource consumption. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-16118. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in forwarded on Node.js (JavaScript Library) (affected version unknown). It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation as part of a Regular Expression leads to a resource consumption vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-400. The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource, thereby enabling an actor to influence the amount of resources consumed, eventually leading to the exhaustion of available resources. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
The forwarded module is used by the Express.js framework to handle the X-Forwarded-For header. It is vulnerable to a regular expression denial of service when it's passed specially crafted input to parse. This causes the event loop to be blocked causing a denial of service condition.
The bug was discovered 09/26/2017. The weakness was published 06/07/2018 by Alex (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2017-16118 since 10/29/2017. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1499 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 253 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 104427†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Resource consumptionCWE: CWE-400 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/26/2017 🔍10/29/2017 🔍
06/06/2018 🔍
06/07/2018 🔍
06/07/2018 🔍
06/11/2018 🔍
02/16/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: Alex
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-16118 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-16118
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-119085
SecurityFocus: 104427 - Node.js 'Forwarded' Module CVE-2017-16118 Denial of Service Vulnerability
Entry
Created: 06/07/2018 10:19Updated: 02/16/2020 08:06
Changes: 06/07/2018 10:19 (58), 02/16/2020 08:06 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.