Fujinto Ethereum ERC20 Token mintToken Smart Contract access control
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Fujinto and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is the function mintToken of the component Ethereum ERC20 Token Handler. This manipulation as part of Smart Contract causes access control.
This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2018-12082. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Fujinto (the affected version unknown) and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function mintToken of the component Ethereum ERC20 Token Handler. The manipulation as part of a Smart Contract leads to a access control vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-284. The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto (NTO), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue.
The bug was discovered 06/12/2018. The weakness was disclosed 06/25/2018 (Website). The advisory is shared at peckshield.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2018-12082 since 06/09/2018. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 13 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entries VDB-119847, VDB-119848, VDB-119849 and VDB-119850 are pretty similar. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.4
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Access controlCWE: CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/09/2018 🔍06/12/2018 🔍
06/25/2018 🔍
06/25/2018 🔍
06/25/2018 🔍
02/21/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: peckshield.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2018-12082 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-12082
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-119857
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/25/2018 21:57Updated: 02/21/2020 16:47
Changes: 06/25/2018 21:57 (57), 02/21/2020 16:47 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.