Apple iOS up to 12 Erase privileges management ⚔ [Disputed]

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
5.2$5k-$25k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Apple iOS up to 12. This impacts an unknown function of the component Erase. Performing a manipulation results in privileges management. Attacking locally is a requirement. Furthermore, an exploit is available. There are still doubts about whether this vulnerability truly exists.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Apple iOS up to 12 (Smartphone Operating System). This affects an unknown code of the component Erase. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

The weakness was published 06/22/2018 by Hacker Fantastic as not defined tweet (Twitter). The advisory is shared at twitter.com. The public release happened without involvement of Apple. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a private exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 03/16/2020). It is expected to see the exploit prices for this product increasing in the near future.MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue. The advisory points out:

IOS has a glitch in the UI when pins are sent as duplicates or too quickly, to prevent accidental pin entry these pins are never tested by the device. This video showed what was original believed to be a bypass exploit for the erase data function, however the SEP is not actually processing the majority of the input PIN's due to the aforementioned feature in IOS. So although the device appears to process multiple pins sent at once, it in fact only processes a smaller number of inputs. This means the bypass attack isn't valid as it only appears that those pins were tested.

A private exploit has been developed by Hacker Fantastic. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityTracker (ID 1041177†). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

Video

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.9
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.2

VulDB Base Score: 5.9
VulDB Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Privileges management
CWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No

Availability: 🔍
Access: Private
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Author: Hacker Fantastic
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

06/22/2018 🔍
06/23/2018 +1 days 🔍
06/25/2018 +2 days 🔍
03/16/2020 +630 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: apple.com

Advisory: twitter.com
Researcher: Hacker Fantastic
Status: Not defined
Disputed: 🔍

GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-119865
SecurityTracker: 1041177

scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20150917

Entryinfo

Created: 06/25/2018 22:14
Updated: 03/16/2020 20:26
Changes: 06/25/2018 22:14 (48), 03/16/2020 20:26 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Are you interested in using VulDB?

Download the whitepaper to learn more about our service!