| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in etktokens. Affected by this issue is the function mintToken. The manipulation as part of Smart Contract leads to integer overflow.
This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2018-13160. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in etktokens (the affected version is unknown). This issue affects the function mintToken. The manipulation as part of a Smart Contract leads to a integer overflow vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-190. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound, when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This can introduce other weaknesses when the calculation is used for resource management or execution control. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for etktokens (ETK), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.
The bug was discovered 07/04/2018. The weakness was released 07/05/2018 (Website). The advisory is shared at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2018-13160 since 07/04/2018. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at VDB-120336, VDB-120337, VDB-120338 and VDB-120339. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.4
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Integer overflowCWE: CWE-190 / CWE-189
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
Timeline
07/04/2018 🔍07/04/2018 🔍
07/04/2018 🔍
07/05/2018 🔍
07/05/2018 🔍
02/25/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2018-13160 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-13160
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-120341
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 07/05/2018 12:34Updated: 02/25/2020 10:59
Changes: 07/05/2018 12:34 (55), 02/25/2020 10:59 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.