| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability described as problematic has been identified in WebkitGTK+. Affected is an unknown function of the component Auditor. The manipulation of the argument srcdoc with the input iframe src=""srcdoc="<script>alert('xss')</script>" results in security check.
The attack can be executed remotely. Additionally, an exploit exists.
Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability was found in WebkitGTK+ (Web Browser). It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown code block of the component Auditor. The manipulation of the argument srcdoc with the input value iframe src=""srcdoc="<script>alert('xss')</script>" leads to a security check vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-358. The product does not implement or incorrectly implements one or more security-relevant checks as specified by the design of a standardized algorithm, protocol, or technique. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The weakness was released 01/22/2014 as Chrome (and Safari) antiXSS filter bypass as confirmed mailinglist post (Full-Disclosure). The advisory is available at seclists.org. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. Successful exploitation requires user interaction by the victim. Technical details and a public exploit are known. This vulnerability is assigned to T1211 by the MITRE ATT&CK project.
A public exploit has been developed in HTML/Javascript and been published immediately after the advisory. The exploit is shared for download at seclists.org. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 91 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability. The mailinglist post contains the following remark:
Chrome has just fixed it in recent 32.0.1700.76 version.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 65066†) and OSVDB (102412†). If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Affected
- WebkitGTK+
- Apple Safari
- Google Chrome 31.0.1650.63
Product
Type
Name
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Security checkCWE: CWE-358
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/23/2013 🔍01/20/2014 🔍
01/22/2014 🔍
01/22/2014 🔍
01/24/2014 🔍
08/18/2016 🔍
Sources
Advisory: Chrome (and Safari) antiXSS filter bypassStatus: Confirmed
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-12066
SecurityFocus: 65066 - Google Chrome Cross Site Scripting Filter Security Bypass Vulnerability
OSVDB: 102412
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 01/24/2014 12:00Updated: 08/18/2016 11:11
Changes: 01/24/2014 12:00 (48), 08/18/2016 11:11 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:1BC:103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.