| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Yokogawa STARDOM FCJ, STARDOM FCN-100, STARDOM FCN-RTU and STARDOM FCN-500 up to R4.02. Impacted is an unknown function. This manipulation causes hard-coded credentials. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2018-10592. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Yokogawa STARDOM FCJ, STARDOM FCN-100, STARDOM FCN-RTU and STARDOM FCN-500 up to R4.02. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a hard-coded credentials vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-798. The product contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Yokogawa STARDOM FCJ controllers R4.02 and prior, FCN-100 controllers R4.02 and prior, FCN-RTU controllers R4.02 and prior, and FCN-500 controllers R4.02 and prior utilize hard-coded credentials that could allow an attacker to gain unauthorized administrative access to the device, which could result in remote code execution.
The bug was discovered 05/31/2018. The weakness was disclosed 07/31/2018 by Venustech (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2018-10592 since 05/01/2018. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1110.001 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 61 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 104376†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.5
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Hard-coded credentialsCWE: CWE-798 / CWE-259 / CWE-255
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/01/2018 🔍05/31/2018 🔍
05/31/2018 🔍
07/31/2018 🔍
07/31/2018 🔍
08/01/2018 🔍
03/11/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: Venustech
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2018-10592 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-10592
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-122347
SecurityFocus: 104376 - Multiple Yokogawa STARDOM Controllers CVE-2018-10592 Security Bypass Vulnerability
Entry
Created: 08/01/2018 07:57Updated: 03/11/2020 13:31
Changes: 08/01/2018 07:57 (59), 03/11/2020 13:31 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.