Mitel MiVoice Office 400 up to R5.0 start.asp Error Reflected cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Mitel MiVoice Office 400 up to R5.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file start.asp. The manipulation of the argument Error leads to cross site scripting (Reflected). This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2018-16226. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Mitel MiVoice Office 400 up to R5.0. This issue affects an unknown code of the file start.asp. The manipulation of the argument error with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability (Reflected). Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
A vulnerability in the web admin component of Mitel MiVoice Office 400, versions R5.0 HF3 (v8839a1) and earlier, could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attack, due to insufficient validation for the start.asp page. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary scripts to access sensitive browser-based information.
The bug was discovered 09/04/2018. The weakness was published 10/23/2018 (Website). The advisory is shared at mitel.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2018-16226 since 08/30/2018. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 49 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k. By approaching the search of inurl:start.asp it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: ReflectedClass: Cross site scripting / Reflected
CWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/30/2018 🔍09/04/2018 🔍
10/23/2018 🔍
10/23/2018 🔍
10/24/2018 🔍
01/12/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: mitel.comStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2018-16226 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-16226
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-125885
Entry
Created: 10/24/2018 06:46Updated: 01/12/2025 19:46
Changes: 10/24/2018 06:46 (57), 04/06/2020 09:37 (2), 01/12/2025 19:46 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Duplicate
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.