GNU binutils 2.31 libbfd syms.c _bfd_generic_read_minisymbols resource management

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability described as problematic has been identified in GNU binutils 2.31. This affects the function _bfd_generic_read_minisymbols of the file syms.c of the component libbfd. Executing a manipulation can lead to resource management.
This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2018-20002. The attack is restricted to local execution. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in GNU binutils 2.31 (Programming Tool Software). It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects the function _bfd_generic_read_minisymbols of the file syms.c of the component libbfd. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a resource management vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-399. As an impact it is known to affect availability. CVE summarizes:
The _bfd_generic_read_minisymbols function in syms.c in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd), as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.31, has a memory leak via a crafted ELF file, leading to a denial of service (memory consumption), as demonstrated by nm.
The bug was discovered 12/07/2018. The weakness was disclosed 12/10/2018 (Website). The advisory is available at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability was named CVE-2018-20002 since 12/09/2018. The attack can be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is required for a successful exploitation. Successful exploitation requires user interaction by the victim. Technical details are known, but there is no available exploit.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 2 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
Applying the patch c2f5dc30afa34696f2da0081c4ac50b958ecb0e9 is able to eliminate this problem.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 106142†). The entries VDB-127694 and VDB-127695 are pretty similar. If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.gnu.org/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Resource managementCWE: CWE-399 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Patch: c2f5dc30afa34696f2da0081c4ac50b958ecb0e9
Timeline
12/07/2018 🔍12/09/2018 🔍
12/09/2018 🔍
12/09/2018 🔍
12/10/2018 🔍
12/10/2018 🔍
06/13/2023 🔍
Sources
Vendor: gnu.orgAdvisory: K62602089⛔
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2018-20002 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-20002
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-127762
SecurityFocus: 106142 - GNU Binutils CVE-2018-20002 Denial of Service Vulnerability
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 12/10/2018 10:46Updated: 06/13/2023 20:49
Changes: 12/10/2018 10:46 (62), 04/19/2020 12:29 (4), 06/13/2023 20:41 (4), 06/13/2023 20:49 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.