D-Link myDlink Baby App 2.04.06 Credentials credentials management
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in D-Link myDlink Baby App 2.04.06. It has been classified as critical. The impacted element is an unknown function. This manipulation causes credentials management (Credentials). This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2018-18767. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in D-Link myDlink Baby App 2.04.06 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a credentials management vulnerability (Credentials). The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-255. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered in D-Link 'myDlink Baby App' version 2.04.06. Whenever actions are performed from the app (e.g., change camera settings or play lullabies), it communicates directly with the Wi-Fi camera (D-Link 825L firmware 1.08) with the credentials (username and password) in base64 cleartext. An attacker could conduct an MitM attack on the local network and very easily obtain these credentials.
The bug was discovered 11/05/2018. The weakness was published 12/20/2018 (Website). The advisory is shared at dojo.bullguard.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2018-18767 since 10/28/2018. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/23/2020). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1552 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 45 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Similar entries are available at VDB-128242 and VDB-128243. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.dlink.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.6
VulDB Temp Score: 5.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.0
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: CredentialsClass: Credentials management / Credentials
CWE: CWE-255
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/28/2018 🔍11/05/2018 🔍
12/20/2018 🔍
12/20/2018 🔍
12/21/2018 🔍
04/23/2020 🔍
Sources
Vendor: dlink.comAdvisory: dojo.bullguard.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2018-18767 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-18767
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-128245
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 12/21/2018 12:57Updated: 04/23/2020 06:54
Changes: 12/21/2018 12:57 (58), 04/23/2020 06:54 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.