Aterm W300P up to 1.0.13 HTTP Request memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Aterm W300P up to 1.0.13. Affected is an unknown function. This manipulation as part of HTTP Request causes memory corruption. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2018-0632. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Aterm W300P up to 1.0.13. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality. The manipulation as part of a HTTP Request leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Buffer overflow in Aterm W300P Ver1.0.13 and earlier allows attacker with administrator rights to execute arbitrary code via HTTP request and response.
The bug was discovered 07/28/2018. The weakness was shared 01/09/2019 (Website). The advisory is shared at jvn.jp. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2018-0632 since 11/27/2017. The attack can be launched remotely. A single authentication is required for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 165 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entries VDB-128806, VDB-128807, VDB-128808 and VDB-128810 are related to this item. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.7
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.2
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/27/2017 🔍07/28/2018 🔍
01/09/2019 🔍
01/09/2019 🔍
01/10/2019 🔍
04/27/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: jvn.jpStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2018-0632 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-0632
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-128809
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 01/10/2019 08:04Updated: 04/27/2020 07:40
Changes: 01/10/2019 08:04 (57), 04/27/2020 07:40 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.