Aterm HC100RC up to 1.0.1 filename os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability described as critical has been identified in Aterm HC100RC up to 1.0.1. This affects an unknown part. Executing a manipulation of the argument filename as part of Parameter can lead to os command injection. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2018-0635. The attack can be launched remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Aterm HC100RC up to 1.0.1 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects an unknown code block. The manipulation of the argument filename as part of a Parameter leads to a os command injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
Aterm HC100RC Ver1.0.1 and earlier allows attacker with administrator rights to execute arbitrary OS commands via filename parameter.
The bug was discovered 07/12/2018. The weakness was disclosed 01/09/2019 (Website). The advisory is shared for download at jvn.jp. This vulnerability was named CVE-2018-0635 since 11/27/2017. The attack can be initiated remotely. The requirement for exploitation is a single authentication. There are known technical details, but no exploit is available. The MITRE ATT&CK project declares the attack technique as T1202.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 181 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entries VDB-128811, VDB-128813, VDB-128814 and VDB-128815 are pretty similar. Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.7
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.2
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/27/2017 🔍07/12/2018 🔍
01/09/2019 🔍
01/09/2019 🔍
01/10/2019 🔍
04/27/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: jvn.jpStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2018-0635 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-0635
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-128812
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 01/10/2019 08:07Updated: 04/27/2020 08:12
Changes: 01/10/2019 08:07 (58), 04/27/2020 08:12 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.