Yokogawa iDefine for ProSafe-RS License Management memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Yokogawa iDefine for ProSafe-RS, STARDOM VDS, STARDOM FCN, STARDOM FCJ, ASTRAPLANNER and TriFellows. It has been classified as critical. This impacts an unknown function of the component License Management. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2018-0651. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Yokogawa iDefine for ProSafe-RS, STARDOM VDS, STARDOM FCN, STARDOM FCJ, ASTRAPLANNER and TriFellows. This issue affects an unknown code block of the component License Management. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Buffer overflow in the license management function of YOKOGAWA products (iDefine for ProSafe-RS R1.16.3 and earlier, STARDOM VDS R7.50 and earlier, STARDOM FCN/FCJ Simulator R4.20 and earlier, ASTPLANNER R15.01 and earlier, TriFellows V5.04 and earlier) allows remote attackers to stop the license management function or execute an arbitrary program via unspecified vectors.
The bug was discovered 08/21/2018. The weakness was shared 01/09/2019 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2018-0651 since 11/27/2017. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 141 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 105124†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.5
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/27/2017 🔍08/21/2018 🔍
08/21/2018 🔍
01/09/2019 🔍
01/09/2019 🔍
01/10/2019 🔍
04/27/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2018-0651 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-0651
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-128819
SecurityFocus: 105124 - Multiple Yokogawa Products CVE-2018-0651 Stack Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Entry
Created: 01/10/2019 10:12Updated: 04/27/2020 09:13
Changes: 01/10/2019 10:12 (57), 04/27/2020 09:13 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.