D-Link DIR-823G 1.02B03 HNAP API /bin/goahead SetFactoryDefault access control
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in D-Link DIR-823G 1.02B03. This affects the function SetFactoryDefault of the file /bin/goahead of the component HNAP API. The manipulation leads to access control.
This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2019-7389. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in D-Link DIR-823G 1.02B03 (Router Operating System). It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects the function SetFactoryDefault of the file /bin/goahead of the component HNAP API. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a access control vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-284. The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered in /bin/goahead on D-Link DIR-823G devices with the firmware 1.02B03. There is incorrect access control allowing remote attackers to reset the router without authentication via the SetFactoryDefault HNAP API. Consequently, an attacker can achieve a denial-of-service attack without authentication.
The bug was discovered 02/01/2019. The weakness was disclosed 02/05/2019 (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2019-7389 since 02/04/2019. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 07/06/2023). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 4 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entries VDB-130518 and VDB-130516 are pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.dlink.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Access controlCWE: CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/01/2019 🔍02/04/2019 🔍
02/05/2019 🔍
02/05/2019 🔍
07/06/2023 🔍
Sources
Vendor: dlink.comAdvisory: securityfocus.com⛔
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2019-7389 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-7389
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-130517
SecurityFocus: 106853
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 02/05/2019 12:02Updated: 07/06/2023 08:42
Changes: 02/05/2019 12:02 (58), 05/08/2020 09:56 (2), 07/06/2023 08:42 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.