Config File Provider Plugin up to 3.4.1 on Jenkins configfiles.jelly cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Config File Provider Plugin up to 3.4.1 on Jenkins. This affects an unknown part of the file src/main/resources/lib/configfiles/configfiles.jelly. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2019-1003014. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Config File Provider Plugin up to 3.4.1 on Jenkins (Jenkins Plugin). It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown processing of the file src/main/resources/lib/configfiles/configfiles.jelly. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
An cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in Jenkins Config File Provider Plugin 3.4.1 and earlier in src/main/resources/lib/configfiles/configfiles.jelly that allows attackers with permission to define shared configuration files to execute arbitrary JavaScript when a user attempts to delete the shared configuration file.
The bug was discovered 01/28/2019. The weakness was published 02/06/2019 (Website). The advisory is shared at jenkins.io. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2019-1003014 since 02/06/2019. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Required for exploitation is a authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 9 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.6
VulDB Base Score: 2.4
VulDB Temp Score: 2.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 4.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/28/2019 🔍02/06/2019 🔍
02/06/2019 🔍
02/07/2019 🔍
05/08/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: jenkins.ioStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2019-1003014 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-1003014
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-130605
Entry
Created: 02/07/2019 09:20Updated: 05/08/2020 18:50
Changes: 02/07/2019 09:20 (56), 05/08/2020 18:50 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.