Genivia gSOAP up to 2.7.x/2.8.74 libgsoapck/libgsoapck++ memory corruption

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability has been found in Genivia gSOAP up to 2.7.x/2.8.74 and classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the component libgsoapck/libgsoapck++. This manipulation causes memory corruption. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2019-7659. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit. The affected component should be upgraded.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability has been found in Genivia gSOAP up to 2.7.x/2.8.74 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the component libgsoapck/libgsoapck++. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:

Genivia gSOAP 2.7.x and 2.8.x before 2.8.75 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (application abort) or possibly have unspecified other impact if a server application is built with the -DWITH_COOKIES flag. This affects the C/C++ libgsoapck/libgsoapck++ and libgsoapssl/libgsoapssl++ libraries, as these are built with that flag.

The bug was discovered 01/14/2019. The weakness was presented 02/09/2019 (Website). The advisory is shared at genivia.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2019-7659 since 02/09/2019. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.

The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 26 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 176675 (Debian Security Update for gsoap (DLA 1681-1)).

Upgrading to version 2.8.75 eliminates this vulnerability.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

• Genivia

Name

• gSOAP

Version

• 2.0
• 2.1
• 2.2
• 2.3
• 2.4
• 2.5
• 2.6
• 2.7
• 2.8.0
• 2.8.1
• 2.8.2
• 2.8.3
• 2.8.4
• 2.8.5
• 2.8.6
• 2.8.7
• 2.8.8
• 2.8.9
• 2.8.10
• 2.8.11
• 2.8.12
• 2.8.13
• 2.8.14
• 2.8.15
• 2.8.16
• 2.8.17
• 2.8.18
• 2.8.19
• 2.8.20
• 2.8.21
• 2.8.22
• 2.8.23
• 2.8.24
• 2.8.25
• 2.8.26
• 2.8.27
• 2.8.28
• 2.8.29
• 2.8.30
• 2.8.31
• 2.8.32
• 2.8.33
• 2.8.34
• 2.8.35
• 2.8.36
• 2.8.37
• 2.8.38
• 2.8.39
• 2.8.40
• 2.8.41
• 2.8.42
• 2.8.43
• 2.8.44
• 2.8.45
• 2.8.46
• 2.8.47
• 2.8.48
• 2.8.49
• 2.8.50
• 2.8.51
• 2.8.52
• 2.8.53
• 2.8.54
• 2.8.55
• 2.8.56
• 2.8.57
• 2.8.58
• 2.8.59
• 2.8.60
• 2.8.61
• 2.8.62
• 2.8.63
• 2.8.64
• 2.8.65
• 2.8.66
• 2.8.67
• 2.8.68
• 2.8.69
• 2.8.70
• 2.8.71
• 2.8.72
• 2.8.73
• 2.8.74

CPE 2.3info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CPE 2.2info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion