Cordaware bestinformed up to 6.2.0 Microsoft Windows Client Certificate certificate validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Cordaware bestinformed up to 6.2.0. This affects an unknown function of the component Microsoft Windows Client. Performing a manipulation as part of Certificate results in certificate validation. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2019-6266. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Cordaware bestinformed up to 6.2.0. This affects an unknown code of the component Microsoft Windows Client. The manipulation as part of a Certificate leads to a certificate validation vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-295. The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Cordaware bestinformed Microsoft Windows client before 6.2.1.0 is affected by insecure SSL certificate verification and insecure access patterns. These issues allow remote attackers to downgrade encrypted connections to cleartext.
The bug was discovered 01/14/2019. The weakness was published 02/25/2019. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2019-6266 since 01/14/2019. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1587.003 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 42 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
Upgrading to version 6.2.1.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
Similar entry is available at VDB-131204. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Certificate validationCWE: CWE-295 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: bestinformed 6.2.1.0
Timeline
01/14/2019 🔍01/14/2019 🔍
02/25/2019 🔍
02/26/2019 🔍
07/19/2023 🔍
Sources
Advisory: detack.deStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2019-6266 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-6266
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-131205
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 02/26/2019 08:47Updated: 07/19/2023 16:35
Changes: 02/26/2019 08:47 (59), 05/12/2020 20:50 (1), 07/19/2023 16:35 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.