GraphicsMagick 1.3.31 XWD Image File coders/xwd.c Floating Point input validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in GraphicsMagick 1.3.31. This impacts an unknown function of the file coders/xwd.c of the component XWD Image File Handler. Performing a manipulation results in input validation (Floating Point). This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2019-11474. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in GraphicsMagick 1.3.31 (Image Processing Software). It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown functionality of the file coders/xwd.c of the component XWD Image File Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability (Floating Point). CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
coders/xwd.c in GraphicsMagick 1.3.31 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (floating-point exception and application crash) by crafting an XWD image file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-11008 and CVE-2019-11009.
The bug was discovered 04/23/2019. The weakness was shared 04/23/2019 (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2019-11474 since 04/23/2019. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 172376 (OpenSUSE Security Update for GraphicsMagick (openSUSE-SU-2019:1355-1)).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 108055†). The entries VDB-133988, VDB-134031 and VDB-134032 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: Floating PointClass: Input validation / Floating Point
CWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/23/2019 🔍04/23/2019 🔍
04/23/2019 🔍
04/23/2019 🔍
04/24/2019 🔍
09/06/2023 🔍
Sources
Advisory: USN-4207-1⛔Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2019-11474 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-11474
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-133989
SecurityFocus: 108055 - GraphicsMagick 'coders/xwd.c' Multiple Denial of Service Vulnerabilities
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 04/23/2019 19:36Updated: 09/06/2023 16:30
Changes: 04/23/2019 19:36 (60), 06/01/2020 16:09 (4), 09/06/2023 16:30 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.