Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite up to 8.7.x/8.8.11 Feed server-side request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite up to 8.7.x/8.8.11. It has been rated as critical. This affects an unknown part of the component Feed. This manipulation causes server-side request forgery. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2019-6981. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite up to 8.7.x/8.8.11 (Groupware Software). It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the component Feed. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Zimbra Collaboration Suite 8.7.x through 8.8.11 allows Blind SSRF in the Feed component.
The weakness was shared 05/29/2019. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2019-6981 since 01/28/2019. The attack can be launched remotely. The successful exploitation requires a single authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 241987 (Zimbra Collaboration Server < 8.7.11 Patch 11, 8.8 < 8.8.9 Patch 10, 8.8.10 < Patch 8, 8.8.11 < Patch 4), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Tenable (241987). The entry VDB-135708 is related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://synacor.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Server-side request forgeryCWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 241987
Nessus Name: Zimbra Collaboration Server < 8.7.11 Patch 11, 8.8 < 8.8.9 Patch 10, 8.8.10 < Patch 8, 8.8.11 < Patch 4
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/28/2019 🔍05/29/2019 🔍
05/30/2019 🔍
07/12/2025 🔍
Sources
Vendor: synacor.comAdvisory: bugzilla.zimbra.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2019-6981 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-6981
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-135709
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 05/30/2019 09:45Updated: 07/12/2025 01:49
Changes: 05/30/2019 09:45 (36), 06/17/2020 09:39 (18), 09/25/2023 09:19 (3), 07/12/2025 01:49 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.