| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Microsoft Windows NT 4.0/2000. It has been classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component RSHSVC. Performing a manipulation results in privileges management. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-1999-0249. The attack must be initiated from a local position. There is no exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Microsoft Windows NT 4.0/2000 (Operating System). This affects an unknown code block of the component RSHSVC. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
windows nt rshsvc program allows remote users to execute arbitrary commands.
The weakness was shared 01/01/1997. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-1999-0249. The exploitability is told to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. The requirement for exploitation is a authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 10245 (rsh Service Detection), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Service detection.
Upgrading to version XP or Server 2003 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (2995), Tenable (10245) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-432†). The entry VDB-14415 is related to this item. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.microsoft.com/
- Product: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Base Score: 7.8
VulDB Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 10245
Nessus Name: rsh Service Detection
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Windows XP/Server 2003
Timeline
01/01/1997 🔍01/01/1997 🔍
01/01/1999 🔍
12/19/2002 🔍
06/17/2014 🔍
06/23/2021 🔍
Sources
Vendor: microsoft.comProduct: microsoft.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-1999-0249 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-1999-0249
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-13809
X-Force: 2995
Vulnerability Center: 432 - The Rsh/Rlogin Service is Running, Info
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/18/2014 00:04Updated: 06/23/2021 03:14
Changes: 06/18/2014 00:04 (57), 04/07/2017 16:02 (1), 06/23/2021 03:14 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.