Maple WBT SNMP Administrator 2.0.195.15 CE Remote Feature SnmpAdm.exe Long String memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Maple WBT SNMP Administrator 2.0.195.15. This affects an unknown part of the file SnmpAdm.exe of the component CE Remote Feature. Performing a manipulation as part of Long String results in memory corruption. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2019-13577. The attack can be initiated remotely. Additionally, an exploit exists. It is suggested to use restrictive firewalling.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Maple WBT SNMP Administrator 2.0.195.15. This affects an unknown code of the file SnmpAdm.exe of the component CE Remote Feature. The manipulation as part of a Long String leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
SnmpAdm.exe in MAPLE WBT SNMP Administrator v2.0.195.15 has an Unauthenticated Remote Buffer Overflow via a long string to the CE Remote feature listening on Port 987.
The weakness was released 07/17/2019 as not defined mailinglist post (Full-Disclosure). The advisory is shared at seclists.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2019-13577 since 07/13/2019. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details and a public exploit are known.
The exploit is shared for download at packetstormsecurity.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
It is possible to mitigate the weakness by firewalling 987.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Exploit-DB (47130). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.1
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: FirewallStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Firewalling: 🔍
Timeline
07/13/2019 🔍07/17/2019 🔍
07/18/2019 🔍
11/09/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: 153675Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2019-13577 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-13577
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-138261
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 07/18/2019 08:29Updated: 11/09/2025 23:07
Changes: 07/18/2019 08:29 (42), 07/08/2020 09:23 (17), 11/01/2023 11:21 (4), 06/16/2024 17:09 (22), 11/09/2025 23:07 (5)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.