Magento up to 2.1.17/2.2.8/2.3.1 Admin Panel Attribute Stored cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Magento up to 2.1.17/2.2.8/2.3.1. It has been classified as problematic. This impacts an unknown function of the component Admin Panel. The manipulation as part of Attribute leads to cross site scripting (Stored). This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2019-7926. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Magento up to 2.1.17/2.2.8/2.3.1. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects an unknown code block of the component Admin Panel. The manipulation as part of a Attribute leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability (Stored). Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
A stored cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in the admin panel of Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. This could be exploited by an authenticated user with privileges to modify node attributes to inject malicious javascript.
The weakness was published 08/02/2019 (Website). The advisory is shared at magento.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2019-7926 since 02/12/2019. The attack may be initiated remotely. The requirement for exploitation is a simple authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 2.1.18, 2.2.9 or 2.3.2 eliminates this vulnerability.
Similar entries are available at VDB-139397, VDB-139398, VDB-139400 and VDB-139405. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
- 2.1.0
- 2.1.1
- 2.1.2
- 2.1.3
- 2.1.4
- 2.1.5
- 2.1.6
- 2.1.7
- 2.1.8
- 2.1.9
- 2.1.10
- 2.1.11
- 2.1.12
- 2.1.13
- 2.1.14
- 2.1.15
- 2.1.16
- 2.1.17
- 2.2.0
- 2.2.1
- 2.2.2
- 2.2.3
- 2.2.4
- 2.2.5
- 2.2.6
- 2.2.7
- 2.2.8
- 2.3.0
- 2.3.1
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 4.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: StoredClass: Cross site scripting / Stored
CWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Magento 2.1.18/2.2.9/2.3.2
Timeline
02/12/2019 🔍08/02/2019 🔍
08/04/2019 🔍
07/20/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: magento.comStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2019-7926 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-7926
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-139445
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 08/04/2019 07:50Updated: 07/20/2020 09:34
Changes: 08/04/2019 07:50 (58), 07/20/2020 09:34 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.