Wolters Kluwer TeamMate+ up to 3.1 DomainObjectDocumentUpload.ashx cross-site request forgery

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.6$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Wolters Kluwer TeamMate+ up to 3.1. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /TeamMate/Upload/DomainObjectDocumentUpload.ashx. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2019-10253. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Wolters Kluwer TeamMate+ up to 3.1. It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown processing of the file /TeamMate/Upload/DomainObjectDocumentUpload.ashx. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in TeamMate+ 21.0.0.0 that allows a remote attacker to modify application data (upload malicious/forged files on a TeamMate server, or replace existing uploaded files with malicious/forged files). The specific flaw exists within the handling of Upload/DomainObjectDocumentUpload.ashx requests because of failure to validate a CSRF token before handling a POST request.

The weakness was shared 09/02/2019 by Bhadresh Patel as Wolters Kluwer TeamMate+ Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability as confirmed mailinglist post (Bugtraq). The advisory is shared at seclists.org. The vendor cooperated in the coordination of the public release. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2019-10253 since 03/28/2019. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and a public exploit are known.

A public exploit has been developed by Bhadresh Patel and been published immediately after the advisory. The exploit is shared for download at seclists.org. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 104 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.

Upgrading to version 3.2 eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published even before and not after the disclosure of the vulnerability.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.0
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.9

VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Researcher Base Score: 4.3
Researcher Vector: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 6.5
NVD Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Cross-site request forgery
CWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Author: Bhadresh Patel
Download: 🔍

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍

Upgrade: TeamMate+ 3.2

Timelineinfo

03/19/2019 🔍
03/19/2019 +0 days 🔍
03/28/2019 +9 days 🔍
07/01/2019 +95 days 🔍
09/02/2019 +63 days 🔍
09/02/2019 +0 days 🔍
09/02/2019 +0 days 🔍
08/11/2020 +344 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: Wolters Kluwer TeamMate+ Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Researcher: Bhadresh Patel
Status: Confirmed
Coordinated: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2019-10253 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-10253
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-141189
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013

Entryinfo

Created: 09/02/2019 21:11
Updated: 08/11/2020 16:15
Changes: 09/02/2019 21:11 (78), 08/11/2020 16:15 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Do you want to use VulDB in your project?

Use the official API to access entries easily!