DocCms up to 2016.5.17 Module Management File managemodel.php upload_model ZIP Archive privileges management
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in DocCms up to 2016.5.17. It has been rated as critical. The affected element is the function upload_model of the file /admini/controllers/system/managemodel.php of the component Module Management File Handler. Performing a manipulation as part of ZIP Archive results in privileges management.
This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2019-16192. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in DocCms up to 2016.5.17. It has been classified as critical. This affects the function upload_model of the file /admini/controllers/system/managemodel.php of the component Module Management File Handler. The manipulation as part of a ZIP Archive leads to a privileges management vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
upload_model() in /admini/controllers/system/managemodel.php in DocCms 2016.5.17 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code through module management files, as demonstrated by a .php file in a ZIP archive.
The weakness was disclosed 09/09/2019. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2019-16192 since 09/09/2019. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
By approaching the search of inurl:admini/controllers/system/managemodel.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
- 2016.5.0
- 2016.5.1
- 2016.5.2
- 2016.5.3
- 2016.5.4
- 2016.5.5
- 2016.5.6
- 2016.5.7
- 2016.5.8
- 2016.5.9
- 2016.5.10
- 2016.5.11
- 2016.5.12
- 2016.5.13
- 2016.5.14
- 2016.5.15
- 2016.5.16
- 2016.5.17
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.5
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/09/2019 🔍09/09/2019 🔍
09/10/2019 🔍
12/18/2023 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2019-16192 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-16192
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-141477
Entry
Created: 09/10/2019 10:12Updated: 12/18/2023 14:12
Changes: 09/10/2019 10:12 (37), 08/17/2020 16:35 (17), 12/18/2023 14:12 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.