WordPress up to 5.2.2 URL wp-includes/kses.php wp_kses_bad_protocol_once cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in WordPress up to 5.2.2 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function wp_kses_bad_protocol_once of the file wp-includes/kses.php of the component URL Handler. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting.
This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2019-16222. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
The affected component should be upgraded.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in WordPress up to 5.2.2 (Content Management System). This affects the function wp_kses_bad_protocol_once of the file wp-includes/kses.php of the component URL Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
WordPress before 5.2.3 has an issue with URL sanitization in wp_kses_bad_protocol_once in wp-includes/kses.php that can lead to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.
The weakness was shared 09/11/2019 (Website). The advisory is shared at seclists.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2019-16222 since 09/11/2019. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
By approaching the search of inurl:wp-includes/kses.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
Upgrading to version 5.2.3 eliminates this vulnerability.
The entries VDB-141664, VDB-141665, VDB-141666 and VDB-141667 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
Website
- Product: https://wordpress.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 4.7
VulDB Temp Score: 4.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: WordPress 5.2.3
Patch: github.com
Timeline
09/11/2019 🔍09/11/2019 🔍
09/12/2019 🔍
12/19/2023 🔍
Sources
Product: wordpress.comAdvisory: 30ac67579559fe42251b5a9f887211bf61a8ed68
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2019-16222 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-16222
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-141669
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 09/12/2019 08:28Updated: 12/19/2023 11:04
Changes: 09/12/2019 08:28 (58), 08/21/2020 09:20 (1), 12/19/2023 10:58 (5), 12/19/2023 11:04 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.