SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 15/up to 12 nfs-utils Package /var/lib/nfs privileges management
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 15/up to 12 and classified as critical. The affected element is an unknown function in the library /var/lib/nfs of the component nfs-utils Package. Performing a manipulation results in privileges management. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2019-3689. Attacking locally is a requirement. No exploit is available. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 15/up to 12 (Operating System). This affects an unknown part in the library /var/lib/nfs of the component nfs-utils Package. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The nfs-utils package in SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 before and including version 1.3.0-34.18.1 and in SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 before and including version 2.1.1-6.10.2 the directory /var/lib/nfs is owned by statd:nogroup. This directory contains files owned and managed by root. If statd is compromised, it can therefore trick processes running with root privileges into creating/overwriting files anywhere on the system if fs.protected_symlinks is not set
The weakness was published 09/19/2019 as Bug 1150733 as not defined bug report (Bugzilla). The advisory is shared at bugzilla.suse.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2019-3689 since 01/03/2019. An attack has to be approached locally. A authentication is necessary for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
Applying a patch is able to eliminate this problem.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.suse.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Base Score: 7.8
VulDB Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.1
CNA Vector (SUSE): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: PatchStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Patch: fee2cc29e888f2ced6a76990923aef19d326dc0e
Timeline
01/03/2019 🔍09/19/2019 🔍
09/20/2019 🔍
12/26/2023 🔍
Sources
Vendor: suse.comAdvisory: Bug 1150733
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2019-3689 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-3689
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-142005
Entry
Created: 09/20/2019 07:21Updated: 12/26/2023 14:32
Changes: 09/20/2019 07:21 (60), 08/31/2020 09:19 (1), 12/26/2023 14:29 (5), 12/26/2023 14:32 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.