| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Xen up to 4.11.x. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the component PCID Handler. The manipulation leads to input validation. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2019-17348. Local access is required to approach this attack. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Xen up to 4.11.x (Virtualization Software). This issue affects an unknown code block of the component PCID Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.11.x allowing x86 PV guest OS users to cause a denial of service because of an incompatibility between Process Context Identifiers (PCID) and shadow-pagetable switching.
The weakness was disclosed 10/08/2019 (Website). The advisory is shared at seclists.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2019-17348 since 10/07/2019. The exploitation is known to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 09/27/2020).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entries VDB-143049, VDB-143050, VDB-143051 and VDB-143052 are pretty similar. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Base Score: 3.8
VulDB Temp Score: 3.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/07/2019 🔍10/08/2019 🔍
10/09/2019 🔍
09/27/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: seclists.orgStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2019-17348 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-17348
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-143057
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 10/09/2019 12:57Updated: 09/27/2020 18:59
Changes: 10/09/2019 12:57 (54), 09/27/2020 18:59 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.