CentOS-WebPanel.com CentOS Web Panel filemanager2.php cmd_arg Stored cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in CentOS-WebPanel.com CentOS Web Panel filemanager2.php. This impacts an unknown function of the file filemanager2.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument cmd_arg as part of Directory results in cross site scripting (Stored). This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2019-16295. The attack requires a local approach. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in CentOS-WebPanel.com CentOS Web Panel filemanager2.php. This affects an unknown functionality of the file filemanager2.php. The manipulation of the argument cmd_arg as part of a Directory leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability (Stored). CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Stored XSS in filemanager2.php in CentOS-WebPanel.com (aka CWP) CentOS Web Panel 0.9.8.885 exists via the cmd_arg parameter. This can be exploited by a local attacker who supplies a crafted filename within a directory visited by the victim.
The weakness was disclosed 10/31/2019 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at centos-webpanel.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2019-16295 since 09/13/2019. Attacking locally is a requirement. The successful exploitation needs a authentication. Technical details and a public exploit are known. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The exploit is shared for download at packetstormsecurity.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. By approaching the search of inurl:filemanager2.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 4.6
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: StoredClass: Cross site scripting / Stored
CWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/13/2019 🔍10/31/2019 🔍
11/01/2019 🔍
07/01/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: 154990Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2019-16295 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-16295
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-144747
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 11/01/2019 08:52Updated: 07/01/2024 17:14
Changes: 11/01/2019 08:52 (40), 11/01/2019 08:57 (17), 02/01/2024 12:41 (3), 07/01/2024 17:14 (21)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.