| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as very critical has been found in Nvu 0.99+1.0pre. This affects an unknown function of the component Mozilla XPCOM. This manipulation causes Remote Code Execution. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2005-2354. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as very critical was found in Nvu 0.99+1.0pre. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown processing of the component Mozilla XPCOM. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a remote code execution vulnerability. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Nvu 0.99+1.0pre uses an old copy of Mozilla XPCOM which can result in multiple security issues.
The weakness was published 11/05/2019. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2005-2354 since 07/22/2005. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 02/04/2024).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Remote Code ExecutionCWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/22/2005 🔍11/05/2019 🔍
11/06/2019 🔍
02/04/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: attrition.orgStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2005-2354 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2005-2354
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-144955
Entry
Created: 11/06/2019 06:56Updated: 02/04/2024 08:43
Changes: 11/06/2019 06:56 (33), 11/06/2019 07:01 (16), 02/04/2024 08:43 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.