Red Hat JBoss Application Server up to 7.0.x cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Red Hat JBoss Application Server up to 7.0.x. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2011-3609. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Red Hat JBoss Application Server up to 7.0.x (Application Server Software). This issue affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
A CSRF issue was found in JBoss Application Server 7 before 7.1.0. JBoss did not properly restrict access to the management console information (for example via the "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" HTTP access control flag). This can lead to unauthorized information leak if a user with admin privileges visits a specially-crafted web page provided by a remote attacker.
The bug was discovered 12/01/2011. The weakness was published 11/26/2019 by David Black. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2011-3609. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 2917 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.
Upgrading to version 7.1.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 50888†) and OSVDB (77458†). Similar entry is available at VDB-146314. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.redhat.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.8
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: JBoss Application Server 7.1.0
Timeline
09/21/2011 🔍12/01/2011 🔍
12/02/2011 🔍
11/26/2019 🔍
11/26/2019 🔍
02/27/2024 🔍
Sources
Vendor: redhat.comAdvisory: access.redhat.com
Researcher: David Black
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2011-3609 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2011-3609
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-146315
SecurityFocus: 50888 - JBoss AS Administration Cross Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
OSVDB: 77458
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 11/26/2019 09:19Updated: 02/27/2024 18:16
Changes: 11/26/2019 09:19 (41), 11/26/2019 09:24 (21), 02/27/2024 18:16 (5)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.