| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Linux Kernel 2.0.37. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component Segment Limit Handler. This manipulation causes privileges management. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-1999-1166. Furthermore, an exploit is available. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Linux Kernel 2.0.37 (Operating System). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code of the component Segment Limit Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Linux 2.0.37 does not properly encode the Custom segment limit, which allows local users to gain root privileges by accessing and modifying kernel memory.
The weakness was published 07/11/1999 by FIRST (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-1999-1166. The exploitation appears to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
A public exploit has been developed in ANSI C. It is possible to download the exploit at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. We expect the 0-day to have been worth approximately $5k-$25k.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (11202), Exploit-DB (19419), SecurityFocus (BID 523†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-5561†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.kernel.org/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.6
VulDB Base Score: 8.4
VulDB Temp Score: 7.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/11/1999 🔍07/11/1999 🔍
07/11/1999 🔍
07/13/1999 🔍
10/13/2004 🔍
06/21/2014 🔍
10/04/2024 🔍
Sources
Vendor: kernel.orgAdvisory: securityfocus.com⛔
Researcher: FIRST
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-1999-1166 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-1999-1166
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-14725
X-Force: 11202
SecurityFocus: 523 - Linux Segment Limit Vulnerability
Vulnerability Center: 5561 - Linux Kernel 2.0.37 Local Root Privilege, Medium
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 06/21/2014 12:07Updated: 10/04/2024 16:29
Changes: 06/21/2014 12:07 (62), 05/25/2019 10:21 (1), 10/04/2024 16:29 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.