QEMU up to 4.2.0 hw/ide/core.c ide_dma_cb unusual condition ⚔ [Disputed]
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in QEMU up to 4.2.0. Affected by this issue is the function ide_dma_cb of the file hw/ide/core.c. Executing a manipulation can lead to unusual condition.
This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2019-20175. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. No exploit is available.
The existence of this vulnerability is still disputed at present.
Details
A vulnerability was found in QEMU up to 4.2.0 (Virtualization Software). It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects the function ide_dma_cb of the file hw/ide/core.c. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a unusual condition vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-754. The product does not check or incorrectly checks for unusual or exceptional conditions that are not expected to occur frequently during day to day operation of the product. As an impact it is known to affect availability. CVE summarizes:
** DISPUTED ** An issue was discovered in ide_dma_cb() in hw/ide/core.c in QEMU 2.4.0 through 4.2.0. The guest system can crash the QEMU process in the host system via a special SCSI_IOCTL_SEND_COMMAND. It hits an assertion that implies that the size of successful DMA transfers there must be a multiple of 512 (the size of a sector). NOTE: a member of the QEMU security team disputes the significance of this issue because a "privileged guest user has many ways to cause similar DoS effect, without triggering this assert."
The weakness was published 12/31/2019. This vulnerability was named CVE-2019-20175 since 12/31/2019. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is required for a successful exploitation. There are known technical details, but no exploit is available. The current price for an exploit might be approx. USD $5k-$25k (estimation calculated on 06/27/2024).
The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
Website
- Product: https://www.qemu.org/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Unusual conditionCWE: CWE-754
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/31/2019 🔍12/31/2019 🔍
12/31/2019 🔍
06/27/2024 🔍
Sources
Product: qemu.orgAdvisory: lists.nongnu.org
Status: Not defined
Disputed: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2019-20175 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-20175
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-147940
Entry
Created: 12/31/2019 10:42Updated: 06/27/2024 01:16
Changes: 12/31/2019 10:42 (36), 12/31/2019 10:47 (18), 03/18/2024 17:51 (17), 06/27/2024 01:16 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.