ppp up to 2.4.8 pppd eap.c eap_request/eap_response rhostname buffer overflow
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in ppp up to 2.4.8. Affected by this issue is the function eap_request/eap_response of the file eap.c of the component pppd. The manipulation of the argument rhostname leads to buffer overflow.
This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2020-8597. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in ppp up to 2.4.8. This issue affects the function eap_request/eap_response of the file eap.c of the component pppd. The manipulation of the argument rhostname with an unknown input leads to a buffer overflow vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-120. The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer, leading to a buffer overflow. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
eap.c in pppd in ppp 2.4.2 through 2.4.8 has an rhostname buffer overflow in the eap_request and eap_response functions.
The weakness was published 02/03/2020. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2020-8597 since 02/03/2020. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 236550 (Alibaba Cloud Linux 3 : 0071: ppp (ALINUX3-SA-2022:0071)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Tenable (236550). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Buffer overflowCWE: CWE-120 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 236550
Nessus Name: Alibaba Cloud Linux 3 : 0071: ppp (ALINUX3-SA-2022:0071)
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Patch: github.com
Timeline
02/03/2020 🔍02/03/2020 🔍
02/04/2020 🔍
12/03/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: RHSA-2020:0630Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2020-8597 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2020-8597
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-149645
Entry
Created: 02/04/2020 10:53Updated: 12/03/2025 19:13
Changes: 02/04/2020 10:53 (37), 02/04/2020 10:58 (17), 03/28/2024 08:52 (19), 03/28/2024 08:55 (1), 05/21/2025 22:16 (8), 12/03/2025 19:13 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.