lua-openssl 0.7.7-1 X.509 Certificate Validation openssl_x509_check_host Return Value certificate validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.1 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability described as problematic has been identified in lua-openssl 0.7.7-1. Affected by this vulnerability is the function openssl_x509_check_host of the component X.509 Certificate Validation. Such manipulation as part of Return Value leads to certificate validation.
This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2020-9432. The attack can be launched remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in lua-openssl 0.7.7-1 (Network Encryption Software). It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function openssl_x509_check_host of the component X.509 Certificate Validation. The manipulation as part of a Return Value leads to a certificate validation vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-295. The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. Impacted is confidentiality, and integrity. CVE summarizes:
openssl_x509_check_host in lua-openssl 0.7.7-1 mishandles X.509 certificate validation because it uses lua_pushboolean for certain non-boolean return values.
The weakness was disclosed 02/27/2020. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2020-9432 since 02/27/2020. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be launched remotely. No form of authentication is required for exploitation. Technical details are known, but there is no available exploit. The structure of the vulnerability defines a possible price range of USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 02/28/2020). This vulnerability is assigned to T1587.003 by the MITRE ATT&CK project.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entries VDB-150724 and VDB-150723 are pretty similar. If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
Support
- end of life (old version)
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.1
VulDB Base Score: 9.1
VulDB Temp Score: 9.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Certificate validationCWE: CWE-295 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Patch: github.com
Timeline
02/27/2020 🔍02/27/2020 🔍
02/28/2020 🔍
04/07/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: a6dc186dd4b6b9e329a93cca3e7e3cfccfdf3ccaStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2020-9432 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2020-9432
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-150722
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 02/28/2020 15:40Updated: 04/07/2024 13:39
Changes: 02/28/2020 15:40 (38), 02/28/2020 15:45 (18), 04/07/2024 13:39 (19)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.