SCO UnixWare 7.0.0/7.0.1/7.1.0 ppptalk Long Argument memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in SCO UnixWare 7.0.0/7.0.1/7.1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file ppptalk. This manipulation as part of Long Argument causes memory corruption. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2000-0099. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in SCO UnixWare 7.0.0/7.0.1/7.1.0 (Operating System) and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown processing of the file ppptalk. The manipulation as part of a Long Argument leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Buffer overflow in UnixWare ppptalk command allows local users to gain privileges via a long prompt argument.
The weakness was shared 01/18/2000 as not defined posting (Bugtraq). It is possible to read the advisory at marc.theaimsgroup.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2000-0099. The exploitation appears to be easy. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: http://www.sco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.9
VulDB Base Score: 9.3
VulDB Temp Score: 8.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/18/2000 🔍01/18/2000 🔍
06/23/2014 🔍
05/23/2018 🔍
Sources
Vendor: sco.comAdvisory: marc.theaimsgroup.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2000-0099 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2000-0099
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-15259
Entry
Created: 06/23/2014 15:50Updated: 05/23/2018 10:56
Changes: 06/23/2014 15:50 (40), 05/23/2018 10:56 (10)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:012:103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.