Cat Soft Serv-U FTP Server LIST Command SHGetPathFromIDList memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Cat Soft Serv-U FTP Server. It has been rated as problematic. This affects the function SHGetPathFromIDList of the component LIST Command Handler. Performing a manipulation results in memory corruption.
This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2000-0129. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.
Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Cat Soft Serv-U FTP Server (File Transfer Software) (version unknown). This affects the function SHGetPathFromIDList of the component LIST Command Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Buffer overflow in the SHGetPathFromIDList function of the Serv-U FTP server allows attackers to cause a denial of service by performing a LIST command on a malformed .lnk file.
The weakness was shared 02/04/2000 by Ussr Labs. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2000-0129. The exploitability is told to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details and a public exploit are known.
The exploit is shared for download at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability. Attack attempts may be identified with Snort ID 2338.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (4049), Exploit-DB (19743), SecurityFocus (BID 970†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-5829†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.9
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Snort ID: 2338
Snort Message: PROTOCOL-FTP LIST buffer overflow attempt
Snort Class: 🔍
Suricata ID: 2102338
Suricata Class: 🔍
Suricata Message: 🔍
SourceFire IPS: 🔍
Timeline
02/04/2000 🔍02/04/2000 🔍
02/04/2000 🔍
02/04/2000 🔍
11/21/2004 🔍
06/23/2014 🔍
04/22/2025 🔍
Sources
Researcher: Ussr LabsStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2000-0129 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2000-0129
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-15309
X-Force: 4049
SecurityFocus: 970 - Microsoft Windows Shortcut Vulnerability
Vulnerability Center: 5829 - Serv-U FTP Server Shortcut Allows DoS, Low
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 06/23/2014 17:14Updated: 04/22/2025 21:44
Changes: 06/23/2014 17:14 (62), 05/26/2019 06:41 (6), 04/22/2025 21:44 (19)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.