Netgear WN604 Configuration Setting privileges management
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Netgear WAC120, WAC505, WAC510, WNAP320, WNAP210v2, WNDAP350, WNDAP360, WNDAP660, WNDAP620, WND930 and WN604. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Configuration Setting Handler. Performing a manipulation results in privileges management. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2018-21094. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Netgear WAC120, WAC505, WAC510, WNAP320, WNAP210v2, WNDAP350, WNDAP360, WNDAP660, WNDAP620, WND930 and WN604 (Wireless LAN Software). This affects an unknown code of the component Configuration Setting Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by incorrect configuration of security settings. This affects WAC120 before 2.1.7, WAC505 before 5.0.5.4, WAC510 before 5.0.5.4, WNAP320 before 3.7.11.4, WNAP210v2 before 3.7.11.4, WNDAP350 before 3.7.11.4, WNDAP360 before 3.7.11.4, WNDAP660 before 3.7.11.4, WNDAP620 before 2.1.7, WND930 before 2.1.5, and WN604 before 3.3.10.
The weakness was shared 04/27/2020 (Website). The advisory is shared at kb.netgear.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2018-21094 since 04/20/2020. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.
The entry VDB-154391 is related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.netgear.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.3
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.3
CNA Vector (MITRE): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/20/2020 🔍04/27/2020 🔍
04/28/2020 🔍
06/03/2024 🔍
Sources
Vendor: netgear.comAdvisory: kb.netgear.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2018-21094 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-21094
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-154389
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 04/28/2020 09:26Updated: 06/03/2024 08:22
Changes: 04/28/2020 09:26 (38), 04/28/2020 09:31 (12), 10/12/2020 21:07 (1), 10/12/2020 21:14 (1), 06/03/2024 08:22 (32)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.